Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Collin Whitchurch's avatar

Great piece as always, Sam. The immediate question that popped into my head is whether what the Brewers are doing with infield grounders is a historical outlier or not.

I'd be curious where other teams ranked in taking extra outs, win probability added on infield grounders, etc. Whether it be historically great teams we don't necessarily think were "lucky" (recent Dodgers teams, '98 Yankees, etc.), other "outlier" teams ('21 Giants, '05 White Sox, '01 Mariners), or teams that fit narratively with these Brewers (mid-2010s Royals).

Were they also great at these things and we just didn't notice or care because on the surface they appeared to win in more traditional ways?

Burton Beers's avatar

Sam, how does the Brewers' 1,353 ground balls to infielders as a % of batted balls compare to the league average? Are the Brewers hitting more balls on the ground than other teams? If so, don’t we have to deduct the lost win probability of those grounders relative to average rates of line drives, fly balls, etc.?

I don’t know why teams don’t emphasize base running like the Brewers do. As this shows, it’s a cheap way to gain an advantage. This should appeal to spendthrift teams like the Pirates. But as O’Neil Cruz demonstrates daily, base running and hustle are not priorities.

What stands out in these clips is how quickly the Brewers players get out of the box. They hit, don’t watch the hit, run immediately, and drop the bat immediately. Quick out of the box accounts for much of the time it takes to get to first. That plus not watching the ball as you run (something we all learned) and using good sprint techniques to lengthen your stride as you run down the line.

I bet the Brewers don’t stand in the box after a shot in the outfield, admiring a potential dinger, and are legging out doubles and triples.

Great stuff, Sam!

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?